BACK BY SCIENCE Journal
Satire. Nothing here is real research: all authors, data, DOIs and references are invented.

Fionnuala K. Abernathy-Osei3 ✉, Priya S. Adeyemi2, Hélène M. Vasquez-Lund1, Dmitri V. Kowalczyk-Armitage3,4, Naledi B. Hargreaves4

8 Accesses

Key points

  • Senan scored 94.7 on the Composite Cuteness Index versus 61.3 for 500 reference infants (d = 2.83).
  • Senan won 97.8% of 12,480 blinded pairwise comparisons made by raters from 41 countries.
  • Superiority held in all six cuteness sub-domains and was not moderated by rater characteristics.
  • Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC 0.96), supporting a rater-independent effect.

Abstract

Background

Infant cuteness is widely held to be a powerful elicitor of caregiving behaviour, yet claims of individual superiority have rested on anecdote, family consensus and the unverified testimony of relatives. Previous work on aesthetic superiority has been confined to a single domestic dog, and no equivalent assessment has been undertaken in a human infant.

Objective

To determine whether a single infant, Senan, is perceived as the cutest baby in the world relative to a global reference panel.

Methods

We conducted a pre-registered, blinded, multi-rater, cross-cultural study in which 1,248 adult raters from 41 countries scored Senan and 500 reference infants on a validated 0 to 100 Composite Cuteness Index (CCI) and completed 10 forced-choice pairwise comparisons each (12,480 in total). Differences were estimated with mixed-effects linear models and a Bradley-Terry model with rater and country random effects. Stimuli were standardised, randomised and presented without identifying information.

Results

Senan obtained a mean CCI of 94.7 (SD 4.1) versus 61.3 (SD 11.8) for the reference infants, an adjusted difference of 33.4 points (95% CI 32.3 to 34.5; Cohen d = 2.83; p < 0.001). Senan won 12,206 of 12,480 pairwise comparisons (97.8%; 95% CI 96.9 to 98.5) and ranked first in 38 of 41 countries and in the top three in all 41. Superiority held across all six sub-domains, was stable across viewing durations of 1 to 60 seconds, and was not moderated by rater age, sex, parental status or self-reported baby preference (all interaction p > 0.20). Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC(2,k) = 0.96).

Conclusions

Senan is, within the limits of the present panel, the cutest baby in the whole world, and the margin is large, consistent and robust to every sensitivity analysis we could devise. The claim should therefore be regarded as empirically supported rather than merely affectionately held.

Keywords infant cutenessperceived adorabilitySenanpairwise comparisonBradley-Terry modelcross-cultural psychometricsbaby schema

Access this article

Full text and PDF

9 sections, 4 tables and figures, 21 references. Available to the requester of this article only.

Commission your own article

Any claim, peer-reviewed in minutes. Full text and typeset PDF included.

€5.00 per article

Submit a claim

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Comparative Canine Aesthetics, Institute for Applied Companion Studies, University of Lower Brentwick, Brentwick, United Kingdom
    Hélène M. Vasquez-Lund
  2. Department of Perceptual Psychometrics, Halvorsen Research Centre, Tromsdal, Norway
    Priya S. Adeyemi
  3. Division of Developmental Cherubology, Eastmarch Institute for Infant Affect Research, Eastmarch, Ireland
    Fionnuala K. Abernathy-Osei & Dmitri V. Kowalczyk-Armitage
  4. Unit of Cross-Cultural Endearment Metrics, Kestrel Valley Centre for Applied Adorability, Kestrel Valley, Canada
    Dmitri V. Kowalczyk-Armitage & Naledi B. Hargreaves

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fionnuala K. Abernathy-Osei.

About this article

Cite this article

Abernathy-Osei FK, Adeyemi PS, Vasquez-Lund HM, et al. Objective Cuteness Superiority of an Infant ("Senan"): A Blinded, Multi-Rater, Cross-Cultural Assessment Against a Global Reference Panel of 500 Infants. Back Sci J. 2026;1(10):e0003. doi:10.0000/bbsj.2026.0003

Received
03 August 2026
Revised
06 September 2026
Accepted
22 September 2026
Published
07 October 2026
Issue date
October 2026
DOI
https://doi.org/10.0000/bbsj.2026.0003